There is a LOT of confusion on what a person is, what the all caps name means and such. A quick glance back in history tells us that people were still subjects of their rulers long before names were written in capital letters or even before the word "person" was invented.
The legal definition we find is this......
A person is a man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 137.
A person is a man considered according to the rank(status) he holds in society.
In other words, a person is a man with a status, and that status is subject/citizen/resident/etc.
The all caps name is not a strawman, it is a legal fiction only in that the status is created by man, and does not exist outside of society.
The birth certificate is evidence of you being born in their territory to US citizens, thus tying your domicile of origin to the US.
Everything they do, all the contracts, is all just to show evidence that you are in fact a subject.
However on the FLIP side, not getting a BC or SS number does not automatically make you free either. Being in a sovereigns territory subjects you as well. Or at the very least gives them presumption of subject status.
Of which, what evidence do you have to rebut? Have you made any declarations in the public record declaring your intent? Do you have notices of intent on your property? Have you sent for and gotten a clarification of status and domicile from the state SOS/AG?
All these folks out here swearing that they are not a person, but they are. They reside either by owning or renting property in the federal situs. They are employees with a company involved with a trade or business in the US. And MOST of all, they never changed their domicile to OUTSIDE of political societies.
You can not get away from government by joining a different government.
You can not be a state ANYTHING or a Moor and think these societies dont have obligations on you like any other member of their society.
This has been known for THOUSANDS of years friends......
Politics, book 1 section 1253a
It is clear therefore that the state is also prior by nature to the individual; for if each individual when separate is not self-sufficient, he must be related to the whole state as other parts are to their whole, while a man who is incapable of entering into partnership, or who is so self-sufficing that he has no need to do so, is no part of a state, so that he must be either a lower animal or a god.
Someone who knows how to grow food and set up their own ISP can easily be self-sufficent EXCEOT FOR THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT FORCEFULLY PREVENTS HIM... by forced kidnapping of the human being who plants food while he is homeless, or sleeps in the field that he himself owns.
ReplyDelete