Welcome back folks, here to talk to you about glitches in the freedom program. This might sound confusing at first, but by the end you will fully understand it.
The Freedom Program
As you can imagine, it would be quite a feat to brainwash an entire population, how could we get them on the same track, what track would best work, etc. To control what a person thinks you simply have to control what they believe. Well how do you control what they believe? By getting to them first before they have had time to form their own beliefs.
They do this thru a number of ways, of which we will go thru a few today.
1. Loved ones.
Always around, always giving out advice and telling us how the world works. But do they really know? Chances are they do not, no matter how smart they are and how high a pedestal we put them on. My friend's step dad always use to tell him fun facts, my buddy calls them "Danny facts" , because they were false facts, incorrect information given out that was supposed to be true. I myself as well as everyone else has fallen for this, I thought my family was smart, but they turned out as I found out later, to be some of the most ignorant statists in the bunch.
I always tell my girls to question everything, even what me and my wife tell them, we are all prone to making mistakes.
From an early age our loved ones keep repeating the misinformation that came to them in this stage....
2. School
School is where things really kick into overdrive as now the government has control over what goes into our head as truth. This is where the broken record theory is displayed the most by a continuing drumming in our head of the basic facts, 1. we are free, 2. the constitution is this document of freedom, and the bill of rights protects our freedoms 3. Never question authority, Etc.
This is not an exhaustive list by any means.
3. Peer pressure
As social creatures we crave interaction, as such we become a self policing zombie squad. False beliefs are conformed to by those wishing to be "part of the in crowd", if you remember back to your time in school none of the cool crowds were having intelligent debates during lunch hour. They use our need to fit in, coupled with social "norms" that we must fit into in order to be accepted by our peers.
4. Media
Media is used to reinforce our government funded beliefs about freedom and our role in society. They call it t.v. "programming" for a reason, and just a casual glance at family shows from the 50's to now mimics our degradation of the family unit into what it is today.
The freedom program is just a basic set of beliefs the government installed in our brain that branches off and forms other beliefs tied to the core belief. It is the main reason people can not see things for what they are and hence why they get glitches in the program.
What kind of glitch you ask?
Take this story of this man for an example....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2013/09/08/left-with-nothing/?utm_term=.314554cb48e4
Even though it states in that document of freedom "private property shall not be taken without just compensation", this man is still trying to wrap his head around the fact that his house was taken from him and he got no just compensation.
You can find these and many other stories where what we are told and what we see is not coming together like it should. We get these glitches because we are dealing with false beliefs, and when our false beliefs come into contact with factual reality, well it causes a glitch.
Friday, March 3, 2017
Saturday, February 18, 2017
I was a statist, just like you.....
I had the same beliefs pounded into my head daily by the public school government approved textbooks. I was told about the American dream, and freedom, and how we were the only people to have these rights. I felt my heart swell with pride every day in school for the pledge, thinking of the freedom I would pass on to my children one day. As I got older I noticed that things were not always as they seemed. The reality that was all around me was different then the dream they sold me in school.
The lie is a beautiful one, and has fooled many, but it is a lie none the less. Most will never see the lie, because their beliefs are programmed to disregard any info that goes against your textbook education.
As far as statists go, I would be hard pressed to find another that was as uncaring about life around me, besides what the general perception was, than me. I was all about fun, clubs, women, saying up late, buying whatever the tv and my peers told me was "cool" and in fashion. I was as hooked on the dream as everyone else I knew. I had the same set of core beliefs as everyone else thanks to public school, media, peers and loved ones. These core beliefs are used against me to keep me blind to the truth, these beliefs keep me tied to the state as a subject, obligated at birth to perform for a political society I know nothing about. Horrible things done in my name because my lack of understanding has created the perfect opportunity for them to abuse me.
However if you are like me, then you have also had "glitches in the freedom program", simply put these are times when the dream they sold you and reality meet. It's at these times when the moment to awake is upon us, the moment to question. It could be anything, property taxes, income taxes, building permits for a shed, business license for a lemonade stand for your 8 year old, etc. We have all had these glitches, however most drift right back to sleep. It is said that it is easier to believe a beautiful lie then the ugly truth.
But here is the truth, our lack of understanding, of caring, of questioning is not only going to effect us but everyone we know and love. Our children, grand children and everyone else becomes effected thru our lack of understanding. If you have someone who you care about, my advice would be to stop doing what you are doing, erase what you think you know, and start fresh.
Remember that the key to everything, life, freedom, success, etc. It all rests on understanding beliefs and how to use your mind correctly. I know it sucks to hear, because it sucks when I tell myself everyday but everything of importance we know is wrong. And all because of our beliefs can we not understand or even see a problem, except when those problems touch us in some way and give us a glitch in the freedom program.
The lie is a beautiful one, and has fooled many, but it is a lie none the less. Most will never see the lie, because their beliefs are programmed to disregard any info that goes against your textbook education.
As far as statists go, I would be hard pressed to find another that was as uncaring about life around me, besides what the general perception was, than me. I was all about fun, clubs, women, saying up late, buying whatever the tv and my peers told me was "cool" and in fashion. I was as hooked on the dream as everyone else I knew. I had the same set of core beliefs as everyone else thanks to public school, media, peers and loved ones. These core beliefs are used against me to keep me blind to the truth, these beliefs keep me tied to the state as a subject, obligated at birth to perform for a political society I know nothing about. Horrible things done in my name because my lack of understanding has created the perfect opportunity for them to abuse me.
However if you are like me, then you have also had "glitches in the freedom program", simply put these are times when the dream they sold you and reality meet. It's at these times when the moment to awake is upon us, the moment to question. It could be anything, property taxes, income taxes, building permits for a shed, business license for a lemonade stand for your 8 year old, etc. We have all had these glitches, however most drift right back to sleep. It is said that it is easier to believe a beautiful lie then the ugly truth.
But here is the truth, our lack of understanding, of caring, of questioning is not only going to effect us but everyone we know and love. Our children, grand children and everyone else becomes effected thru our lack of understanding. If you have someone who you care about, my advice would be to stop doing what you are doing, erase what you think you know, and start fresh.
Remember that the key to everything, life, freedom, success, etc. It all rests on understanding beliefs and how to use your mind correctly. I know it sucks to hear, because it sucks when I tell myself everyday but everything of importance we know is wrong. And all because of our beliefs can we not understand or even see a problem, except when those problems touch us in some way and give us a glitch in the freedom program.
Monday, February 13, 2017
My youtube video channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHlXLrFdg6tQOwRTzU9pdDQ
I will be posting more videos shortly, hope the information helps you.
My newest video series called "question the state" is a must see series of videos.
I will be posting more videos shortly, hope the information helps you.
My newest video series called "question the state" is a must see series of videos.
Fb Group
For hose of you on Fb I would like to give you my groups link if you would like to engage more on discussions on topics found on this blog.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2109106235982251/
Hope to see you there!
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2109106235982251/
Hope to see you there!
Monday, January 2, 2017
automobile vs motor vehicle.
Hello folks, back to talk with you about how they misuse terms or change words in order to fool us. Today we will be talking about the difference between an automobile and a motor vehicle. A studious learning by now would have noticed that all laws in the motor vehicle code deal ONLY with "motor vehicles" and NONE of them deal with "automobiles".
No big deal you say since as they no doubt will tell you, all motor vehicles are automobiles. This is absolutely correct, however while all motor vehicles may be automobiles, not all automobiles are motor vehicles. The courts have been very clear on the distinction between the two as you will read below.
The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile". - [City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232]
"A carriage is peculiarly a family or household article. It contributes in a large degree to the health, convenience, comfort, and welfare of the householder or of the family." Arthur v Morgan, 113 U.S. 495, 500, 5 S.Ct. 241, 243 S.D. NY 1884).
"The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of." Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now in order to further separate them, we find that during some probate hearings deciding on what goods to classify as personal and what goods to classify as business goods, we find that what use they are put to is a deciding factor.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The use to which an item is put, rather than its physical characteristics,
determine whether it should be classified as ``consumer goods'' under UCC 9-109(1) or ``equipment'' under UCC 9-109(2)." Grimes v Massey Ferguson,
Inc., 23 UCC Rep Serv 655; 355 So.2d 338 (Ala., 1978).
"Under UCC 9-109 there is a real distinction between goods purchased for
personal use and those purchased for business use. The two are mutually
exclusive and the principal use to which the property is put should be
considered as determinative." James Talcott, Inc. v Gee, 5 UCC Rep Serv
1028; 266 Cal.App.2d 384, 72 Cal.Rptr. 168 (1968).
"The classification of goods in UCC 9-109 are mutually exclusive." McFadden
v Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep Serv 766; 260 Md 601, 273
A.2d 198 (1971).
"The classification of ``goods'' under [UCC] 9-109 is a question of fact."
Morgan County Feeders, Inc. v McCormick, 18 UCC Rep Serv 2d 632; 836 P.2d
1051 (Colo. App., 1992).
"The definition of ``goods'' includes an automobile." Henson v Government
Employees Finance & Industrial Loan Corp., 15 UCC Rep Serv 1137; 257 Ark 273,
516 S.W.2d 1 (1974).
Household goods
"The term ``household goods'' ... includes everything about the house that is
usually held and enjoyed therewith and that tends to the comfort and
accommodation of the household. Lawwill v. Lawwill, 515 P.2d 900, 903, 21
Ariz.App. 75" 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) pocket part
94. Cites Mitchell's Will below.
"Automobile purchased for the purpose of transporting buyer to and from his
place of
employment was ``consumer goods'' as defined in UCC 9-109." Mallicoat v
Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp., 3 UCC Rep Serv 1035; 415 S.W.2d 347 (Tenn.
App., 1966).
"The provisions of UCC 2-316 of the Maryland UCC do not apply to sales of
consumer goods (a term which includes automobiles, whether new or used, that
are bought primarily for personal, family, or household use)." Maryland
Independent Automobile Dealers Assoc., Inc. v Administrator, Motor Vehicle
Admin., 25 UCC Rep Serv 699; 394 A.2d 820, 41 Md App 7 (1978).
"An automobile was part of testatrix' ``household goods'' within codicil. In
re Mitchell's Will, 38 N.Y.S.2d 673, 674, 675 [1942]." 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) 512. Cites Arthur v Morgan, supra.
"[T]he expression ``personal effects'' clearly includes an automobile[.]" In
re Burnside's Will, 59 N.Y.S.2d 829, 831 (1945). Cites Hillhouse, Arthur,
and Mitchell's Will, supra.
"[A] yacht and six automobiles were ``personal belongings'' and ``household
effects[.]''" In re Bloomingdale's Estate, 142 N.Y.S.2d 781, 782 (1955).
“A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, ...it is
NOT a REQUIRED to be REGISTERED under this code
“Passenger vehicles which are not used for the
transportation of persons for hire, compensation o
profit, and housecars, are not commercial vehicles”
“a vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.”
and;
Not the type of vehicle required to be registered and “use tax” paid of which the tag is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston vs Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14. And;
“It is held that a tax upon common carriers by motor vehicles is based
upon a reasonable classification, and does not involve any unconstitutional
discrimination, although it does not apply to private vehicles, or those used
the owner in his own business, and not for hire.” Desser v. Wichita, (1915) 96 Kan. 820; Iowa Motor Vehicle Asso. v. Railroad Comrs., 75 A.L.R. 22.
“Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled.” Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20. And;
“In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may”
exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis
means that they “must” exempt them.” State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 6
C.J.S. section 94 page 581.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have found through research that the act of us giving title to the state and getting back a certificate of title changes the classification of our automobile into that of a motor vehicle and thus subjects us to have them regulated by the state.
No big deal you say since as they no doubt will tell you, all motor vehicles are automobiles. This is absolutely correct, however while all motor vehicles may be automobiles, not all automobiles are motor vehicles. The courts have been very clear on the distinction between the two as you will read below.
The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile". - [City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232]
[I]t is a jury question whether ... an automobile ... is a motor vehicle[.]United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1983).
Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled- Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20
The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.- American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200
A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received.- [International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120, 122]
(6) Motor Vehicle. - The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, or passengers and property.-18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions
Used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.- 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions
The word 'operator' shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation.- Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83
A soldier's personal automobile is part of his ‘household goods.- U.S. v Bomar C.A.5(Tex.), 8 F.3d 226, 235. 19A Words and Phrases - Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94.
The Motor Vehicle Act is not unconstitutional as making an arbitrary and unwarranted classification, in that it requires professional chauffeurs, or drivers of motor vehicles for hire, to pay an annual license, but exempts all others operators of such vehicles from tax and regulation.- [In the Matter of Application of Stork (1914), 167 Cal, 294,295]
... (The Motor Vehicle Act classifies) drivers of automobiles into two classes, one professional chauffeurs, and requiring them to obtain a license, and pay an annual license fee of $2.00, the other embracing all others, who are not required to secure a license or pay license fee, is sound classification, and not arbitrary, so as to constitute special legislation.- Ex Parte Stork, 167 Cal 294. The Supreme Court of California Feb 24, 1914 - footnote inparamateria. Further confirmed in Beamon v. DMV (1960), 180. App.2d 200,4 Cal. Rpter396.
"A carriage is peculiarly a family or household article. It contributes in a large degree to the health, convenience, comfort, and welfare of the householder or of the family." Arthur v Morgan, 113 U.S. 495, 500, 5 S.Ct. 241, 243 S.D. NY 1884).
"The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of." Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now in order to further separate them, we find that during some probate hearings deciding on what goods to classify as personal and what goods to classify as business goods, we find that what use they are put to is a deciding factor.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The use to which an item is put, rather than its physical characteristics,
determine whether it should be classified as ``consumer goods'' under UCC 9-109(1) or ``equipment'' under UCC 9-109(2)." Grimes v Massey Ferguson,
Inc., 23 UCC Rep Serv 655; 355 So.2d 338 (Ala., 1978).
"Under UCC 9-109 there is a real distinction between goods purchased for
personal use and those purchased for business use. The two are mutually
exclusive and the principal use to which the property is put should be
considered as determinative." James Talcott, Inc. v Gee, 5 UCC Rep Serv
1028; 266 Cal.App.2d 384, 72 Cal.Rptr. 168 (1968).
"The classification of goods in UCC 9-109 are mutually exclusive." McFadden
v Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep Serv 766; 260 Md 601, 273
A.2d 198 (1971).
"The classification of ``goods'' under [UCC] 9-109 is a question of fact."
Morgan County Feeders, Inc. v McCormick, 18 UCC Rep Serv 2d 632; 836 P.2d
1051 (Colo. App., 1992).
"The definition of ``goods'' includes an automobile." Henson v Government
Employees Finance & Industrial Loan Corp., 15 UCC Rep Serv 1137; 257 Ark 273,
516 S.W.2d 1 (1974).
Household goods
"The term ``household goods'' ... includes everything about the house that is
usually held and enjoyed therewith and that tends to the comfort and
accommodation of the household. Lawwill v. Lawwill, 515 P.2d 900, 903, 21
Ariz.App. 75" 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) pocket part
94. Cites Mitchell's Will below.
"Automobile purchased for the purpose of transporting buyer to and from his
place of
employment was ``consumer goods'' as defined in UCC 9-109." Mallicoat v
Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp., 3 UCC Rep Serv 1035; 415 S.W.2d 347 (Tenn.
App., 1966).
"The provisions of UCC 2-316 of the Maryland UCC do not apply to sales of
consumer goods (a term which includes automobiles, whether new or used, that
are bought primarily for personal, family, or household use)." Maryland
Independent Automobile Dealers Assoc., Inc. v Administrator, Motor Vehicle
Admin., 25 UCC Rep Serv 699; 394 A.2d 820, 41 Md App 7 (1978).
"An automobile was part of testatrix' ``household goods'' within codicil. In
re Mitchell's Will, 38 N.Y.S.2d 673, 674, 675 [1942]." 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) 512. Cites Arthur v Morgan, supra.
"[T]he expression ``personal effects'' clearly includes an automobile[.]" In
re Burnside's Will, 59 N.Y.S.2d 829, 831 (1945). Cites Hillhouse, Arthur,
and Mitchell's Will, supra.
"[A] yacht and six automobiles were ``personal belongings'' and ``household
effects[.]''" In re Bloomingdale's Estate, 142 N.Y.S.2d 781, 782 (1955).
“A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, ...it is
NOT a REQUIRED to be REGISTERED under this code
“Passenger vehicles which are not used for the
transportation of persons for hire, compensation o
profit, and housecars, are not commercial vehicles”
“a vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.”
and;
Not the type of vehicle required to be registered and “use tax” paid of which the tag is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston vs Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14. And;
“It is held that a tax upon common carriers by motor vehicles is based
upon a reasonable classification, and does not involve any unconstitutional
discrimination, although it does not apply to private vehicles, or those used
the owner in his own business, and not for hire.” Desser v. Wichita, (1915) 96 Kan. 820; Iowa Motor Vehicle Asso. v. Railroad Comrs., 75 A.L.R. 22.
“Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled.” Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20. And;
“In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may”
exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis
means that they “must” exempt them.” State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 6
C.J.S. section 94 page 581.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have found through research that the act of us giving title to the state and getting back a certificate of title changes the classification of our automobile into that of a motor vehicle and thus subjects us to have them regulated by the state.
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
The common law is for subjects.
I keep hearing folks go on and on about the common law. Oh we are common law marshals, and judges and grand juries and yada, yada, yada. Sorry folks but the common law does not mean what you think it means.
Common Law
The ancient law of England based upon societal customs and recognized and enforced by the judgments and decrees of the courts. The general body of statutes and case law that governed England and the American colonies prior to the American Revolution.The principles and rules of action, embodied in case law rather than legislative enactments, applicable to the government and protection of persons and property that derive their authority from the community customs and traditions that evolved over the centuries as interpreted by judicial tribunals.
The common law is just that which the court has decided before on a case based on the same set of facts. Thus if you are a citizen in a registered motor vehicle, then common law is not going to save you.
The common law is the common law of the subjects, it is the customs and cases from subjects past long before you were born.
There is NO common law for free men, because you need a society and courts in order for there to be a common law.
Free men use natural law, subjects use common law.
I would suggest a couple of links here, and then followed by extensive research on YOUR part for a better understanding.
http://risetogether.weebly.com/blog/common-law-versus-natural-law
http://risetogether.weebly.com/blog/enslaved-by-the-law-of-the-land-common-law
http://www.starshipearththebigpicture.com/2015/05/24/common-law-vs-natural-law-not-what-you-think-video/
Monday, December 12, 2016
Freedom, what is it?
Most of my fellow countrymen think they are free and perhaps they are. I mean a man not in chains and a cage is free to an extent correct? But what is the freedom our hearts beckon us to? Is it the freedom we have in America?
Most would say not anymore, most would agree that they were able to do more in years past, and the amount of laws passed yearly would be strong evidence in their favor. But where exactly does subjection end and freedom begin?
Most would also say that Americans have more freedom then any other citizen of any other nation. But is that true? How do our freedoms compare? And did Jefferson not say that all men are created equal with unalienable rights? So how can rights of men in different countries be different?
Civil Rights
As always lets start with some definitions and common understanding of what we are discussing.
Civil rights are rights granted by governments to their subjects, no man in any society has his natural unalienable rights, he has traded them for civil rights.
The difference between the two forms of rights, natural vs. civil is wide, and needs a deeper look then what I will give you here. I will say that the bill of rights are nothing but civil rights. We can tell if a right is a civil right a couple of ways. 1. If alone on an island and not in a society, would I have this right? 2. Does this "right" have a fee or permit attached, is it regulated in any way? If so, its a civil right friend.
Right to bear arms.....civil right
Right to gay/straight marriage... civil right
Right to vote.... civil right
The government can regulate or even take away your civil right whenever it wants, hence the gun bans in DC and Chicago for so long.
The concept of freedom is so foreign to most Americans today that I felt compelled to address it here in this post.
A quick google search brings up this thread...
http://www.survivalistboards.com/showthread.php?t=631753
A quick glance will assure you that most have little clue as to what a right is and what it is not. Without this very important information, freedom is a lost concept.
When people think that freedom/rights can be granted, regulated, licensed, etc. Then anything is possible in the deceit of those people, and we can attest to such as time has gone on under the American system of government. As time moves on, more privileges are taken.
It is an absolute must that the nature of our status and obligations as citizens are understood, for if not, we can never truly be free by guessing what the state may or may not, can or can not do.
Thus I implore everyone to use the information presented on this blog, not as a basis for beliefs, but as a starting point for understanding and a dismissal of beliefs as the learning block that blinds us all to certain truths.
Now for those of you who want to understand I offer some links to help you along.
https://theroadtoconcord.com/2013/04/26/defining-natural-rights/
http://jim.com/rights.html
The best understanding you will come to is when you understand the rights you had alone in nature, or alone on a island if you will.
When you come to understand what freedom truly is, you will likely come to the same conclusion that I did, and that is most do not want to be free, and the majority would reject true freedom due to the controlling nature of man and their need to exert control over others, as one of many reasons.
Most would say not anymore, most would agree that they were able to do more in years past, and the amount of laws passed yearly would be strong evidence in their favor. But where exactly does subjection end and freedom begin?
Most would also say that Americans have more freedom then any other citizen of any other nation. But is that true? How do our freedoms compare? And did Jefferson not say that all men are created equal with unalienable rights? So how can rights of men in different countries be different?
Civil Rights
As always lets start with some definitions and common understanding of what we are discussing.
Civil Rights
Personal liberties that belong to an individual, owing to his or her status as a citizen or resident of a particular country or community.Civil rights are rights granted by governments to their subjects, no man in any society has his natural unalienable rights, he has traded them for civil rights.
The difference between the two forms of rights, natural vs. civil is wide, and needs a deeper look then what I will give you here. I will say that the bill of rights are nothing but civil rights. We can tell if a right is a civil right a couple of ways. 1. If alone on an island and not in a society, would I have this right? 2. Does this "right" have a fee or permit attached, is it regulated in any way? If so, its a civil right friend.
Right to bear arms.....civil right
Right to gay/straight marriage... civil right
Right to vote.... civil right
The government can regulate or even take away your civil right whenever it wants, hence the gun bans in DC and Chicago for so long.
The concept of freedom is so foreign to most Americans today that I felt compelled to address it here in this post.
A quick google search brings up this thread...
http://www.survivalistboards.com/showthread.php?t=631753
A quick glance will assure you that most have little clue as to what a right is and what it is not. Without this very important information, freedom is a lost concept.
When people think that freedom/rights can be granted, regulated, licensed, etc. Then anything is possible in the deceit of those people, and we can attest to such as time has gone on under the American system of government. As time moves on, more privileges are taken.
It is an absolute must that the nature of our status and obligations as citizens are understood, for if not, we can never truly be free by guessing what the state may or may not, can or can not do.
Thus I implore everyone to use the information presented on this blog, not as a basis for beliefs, but as a starting point for understanding and a dismissal of beliefs as the learning block that blinds us all to certain truths.
Now for those of you who want to understand I offer some links to help you along.
https://theroadtoconcord.com/2013/04/26/defining-natural-rights/
http://jim.com/rights.html
The best understanding you will come to is when you understand the rights you had alone in nature, or alone on a island if you will.
When you come to understand what freedom truly is, you will likely come to the same conclusion that I did, and that is most do not want to be free, and the majority would reject true freedom due to the controlling nature of man and their need to exert control over others, as one of many reasons.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)