The United States Supreme Court once drew a parallel between
CITIZENSHIP and membership in an association so well, that it
triggered my analogy to that of joining a Country Club:
"... Each of the persons associated becomes a member of the
nation formed by the association. He owes it allegiance and
is entitled to its protection. Allegiance and protection are,
in this connection reciprocal obligations. The one is a
compensation or the other; allegiance for protection and
protection for allegiance.
"For convenience it has been found necessary to give a name to
this membership. The object is to designate by title the
person and the relation he bears to the nation. For this
purpose the words "subject," "inhabitant" and "citizen" have
been used, and the choice between them is sometimes made to
depend upon the form of the Government. Citizen is now more
commonly employed, however, and as it has been considered
better suited to the description of one living under a
Republican Government, it was adopted by nearly all of the
States upon their separation from Great Britain, and was
afterwards adopted in the ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION and in the
Constitution of the United States. When used in this sense it
is understood as conveying the idea of membership of a nation,
and nothing more."
- MINOR VS. HAPPERSETT, 88 U.S. 161, at 166 (1874).
"Since the 14th Amendment makes one a Citizen of the state where
ever he resides, the fact of residence creates universally
recognized reciprocal duties of protection by the state and of
allegiance and support by the Citizen. The latter obviously
includes a duty to pay taxes, and their nature and measure is
largely a political matter."
- MILLER BROTHERS VS. MARYLAND, 347 U.S. 340, at 345
(1954).
ever he resides, the fact of residence creates universally
recognized reciprocal duties of protection by the state and of
allegiance and support by the Citizen. The latter obviously
includes a duty to pay taxes, and their nature and measure is
largely a political matter."
- MILLER BROTHERS VS. MARYLAND, 347 U.S. 340, at 345
(1954).
"In every civilized Country, the individual is BORN to duties
and rights, the duty of allegiance and the right to
protection; and these are correlative obligations, the one the
price of the other, and they constitute the all-sufficient
bond of union between individual and his Country; and the
Country he is born in is, PRIMA FACIE, his Country. In most
countries the old law was broadly laid down that this natural
connection between the individual and his native country was
perpetual; at least, that the tie was indissoluble by the act
of the subject alone..."
and rights, the duty of allegiance and the right to
protection; and these are correlative obligations, the one the
price of the other, and they constitute the all-sufficient
bond of union between individual and his Country; and the
Country he is born in is, PRIMA FACIE, his Country. In most
countries the old law was broadly laid down that this natural
connection between the individual and his native country was
perpetual; at least, that the tie was indissoluble by the act
of the subject alone..."
"But that law of the perpetuity of allegiance is now
changed..." [meaning Americans can dissolve the tie whenever
they feel like it, a severance not possible under the old
Britannic rule of Kings.]
- Edward Bates, United States Attorney General, in
["Citizenship"], 10 Opinions of the Attorney General 382 at
394, [W.H. & O.H. Morrison, Washington (1868)].
"This Government... has certainly some power to protect its
own Citizens in their own country. Allegiance and protection
are reciprocal rights."
- CONGRESSIONAL GLOBE, 39th Congress, 1st Session, at page
1757 (1866).
own Citizens in their own country. Allegiance and protection
are reciprocal rights."
- CONGRESSIONAL GLOBE, 39th Congress, 1st Session, at page
1757 (1866).
The word CITIZEN appears four times in the 14th Amendment; some
are in reference to Citizens of the United States, and others are
in reference to Citizens of the several States. There is a
Citizenship Clause in the 14th Amendment pertaining to the
benefits [a RIGHT is also frequently a benefit] enjoyed by
Citizens of the States in relationship to the benefits enjoyed by
Citizens of other States. Called the PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES
CLAUSE, this Clause has generated a large volume of Court Cases.
are in reference to Citizens of the United States, and others are
in reference to Citizens of the several States. There is a
Citizenship Clause in the 14th Amendment pertaining to the
benefits [a RIGHT is also frequently a benefit] enjoyed by
Citizens of the States in relationship to the benefits enjoyed by
Citizens of other States. Called the PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES
CLAUSE, this Clause has generated a large volume of Court Cases.
See:
- THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS IN THE SEVERAL
STATES, 1 Michigan Law Review 286 (1902);
- Roger Howell in CITIZENSHIP - THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES
OF STATE CITIZENSHIP [John Hopkins Press, Baltimore (1918)];
- Arnold J. Lien in PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS
[Columbia University Press, New York (1913)].
The most predominate ways that an individual can become subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States is by:
1. Violating a law the Government is authorized to prosecute
(counterfeiting, bank robbery, treason, etc.);
2. Be employed by the Federal Government;
3. Apply for its privileges, or accept its benefits;
the jurisdiction of the United States is by:
1. Violating a law the Government is authorized to prosecute
(counterfeiting, bank robbery, treason, etc.);
2. Be employed by the Federal Government;
3. Apply for its privileges, or accept its benefits;
See generally:
- John H. Hughes in THE AMERICAN CITIZEN -- HIS RIGHTS AND
DUTIES [Pudney & Russell, New York (1857)];
- Luella Gettys in THE LAW OF CITIZENSHIP IN THE UNITED
STATES [University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1934)];
- Albert Brill in TEN LECTURES ON CITIZENSHIP [Ascendancy
Foundation, New York (1938)];
- David Josiah Brewer in YALE LECTURES ON THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF CITIZENSHIP -- OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENS [C. Scribner's Sons,
New York (1907)];
- Imp Charles Beard in AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP [MacMillian, New
York (1921)];
- Editors, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP "Rights and Duties of an
American" [American Heritage Foundation, New York (1948)];
- Nathan S. Shaler in CITIZENSHIP "The Citizen -- A Study of
the Individual and the Government" [A.S. Barnes & Company, New
York (1904)];
- Melvin Risa in CITIZENSHIP "Theories on the Obligations of
Citizens to the State," Thesis, [University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia (1921)];
- Ansaldo Ceba in CITIZENSHIP "Rights, Duties, and Privileges
of Citizens" [Paine & Burgess, New York (1845)].
As you can see, the courts and you will find history of citizenship agrees that it is a allegiance for protection contract.
Remember, to understand citizenship, you must research citizenship first.
No comments:
Post a Comment