Monday, October 17, 2016

In it to win it?

I see a lot of posts these days, all talking about the many ways to get freedom, or to get money from the government from your bond, etc. I can not help but think we are better then this crap, if only we could understand that our beliefs are guiding us down different paths. The amount of blind acceptance I see, for something someone already believes in is massive. People filling notices and doing this and doing that. Fake judges and marshals all talking about restoring the constitution and the real republic. I hate to break it to you folks, but here it is ONE MORE TIME, all as in ALL societies are fictions, and members of a society are not free, nor have they ever been, nor will they ever be. Get it yet?

The very nature of society is that members have rights and obligations to the society they live UNDER, I say under because a society can only exist present rule of law. In other words, a society can not exist where the governed do not have to listen to the law of the government.

And we find in ALL societies, that the government, for the public good of course, soon begins limiting what you can do.

If you want to study law/history/freedom, then do so, Stop listening to every guru and learn the information for yourself, come to that understanding for yourself.

Without it, then no answer a guru gives you is going to keep you out of jail.

Stay safe folks.

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

The United States, clearing up the confusion.

Now a LOT of folks think that they were born and live in the United States. This however is wrong, very few of us were born OR live in the United States. First we have to ask, what is the territory of the United States?


Territories of the United States

Portions of the United States that are not within the limits of any state and have not been admitted as states.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Territories+of+the+United+States


---Which makes sense when you consider what the constitution lays out as it's territorial boundaries.---

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html
Art 1 Section 8

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings



As the definition states, portions NOT within the limits of any state. Only federally owned land inside a state(aka army base, etc) would be considered as the United States.

Now as to the District which shall be the seat of our government and it's jurisdiction, how many have heard of the boundary stones? Reading this will be eye opening for most.....  http://www.boundarystones.org/articles/rchs_1897.pdf

Now congress has two jobs, one job it does for the union and is limited by the constitution to only what is mentioned, the second job however is to...

Art 4 Section 3
The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States;

--Make all the needful rules and regulations in relation to their territory. What they do not tell us is if the law they are passing is for the union or the territory.


When people were born in Atlanta before the 14th amendment, then they were born in Georgia, however after the 14th amendment, folks born in that same city of Atlanta were considered born in the United States.

What changed?

First thing that changed was the definition of the term "State", they changed the meaning of this term in 1864 to mean, federal territory. All states after the civil war were now political subdivisions or federal territories. This is confirmed by the 1868 North Carolina inauguration speech from Gov. Worth, just read the first few paragraphs. Also now there are many ways to see it including the Zip Code and SS districts, etc.

So now, when you confess to being born in a state, you are really saying that you are born in the United States, and NOT the separate sovereign State that once was.

Example:  (26) “State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession under the jurisdiction of the United States. The term includes an Indian nation or tribe.

This is from a State statute, but you would be hard pressed to tell me which one, because it does not DEFINE State.

Only thru understanding statutory construction can you figure out what this means.


The united states are composed of DC and any land it owns.

Lets run thru an example to help us understand it better.

Lets say I own half the country, and it is called Patland, and you own half the country and you call it Riotland and we decide we need a uniform guidance between our countries and to help each other for defense. We decide to set up a corporation to handle these affairs, we give a part of our land in each country to this new corporation, call it Patriotland. Now, this land is separate from Patland and Riotland, there are different rules for those living and working there, separate from our own countries rules. Being born there would make you a citizen of Patriotland and not a citizen of either country. Same if you were bon in Patland, clearly you are a citizen of Patland and not Riotland, nor could you be a citizen of Patriotland.

The only way they could say that you were born in the United States is because society is a fiction, and not geographically based, but politically based and the "state" is a political subdivision.

Hope this helps....

Monday, October 3, 2016

The bank loan scam part tre

This part is going to be dealing with the funds transfer and some other parts. We start with some definitions to get us on the same page.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

§ 4A-104.  FUNDS TRANSFER - DEFINITIONS.
In this Article:
 
(a)  "Funds transfer" means the series of transactions, beginning with the originator's payment order, made for the purpose of making payment to the beneficiary of the order.  The term includes any payment order issued by the originator's bank or an intermediary bank intended to carry out the originator's payment order.  A funds transfer is completed by acceptance by the beneficiary's bank of a payment order for the benefit of the beneficiary of the originator's payment order.
 
(b)  "Intermediary bank" means a receiving bank other than the originator's bank or the beneficiary's bank.
 
(c)  "Originator" means the sender of the first payment order in a funds transfer.
 
(d)  "Originator's bank" means (i) the receiving bank to which the payment order of the originator is issued if the originator is not a bank, or (ii) the originator if the originator is a bank.
 
 
§ 4A-202.  AUTHORIZED AND VERIFIED PAYMENT ORDERS.
 
(a)  A payment order received by the receiving bank is the authorized order of the person identified as sender if that person authorized the order or is otherwise bound by it under the law of agency.
 
(d)  The term "sender" in this Article includes the customer in whose name a payment order is issued if the order is the authorized order of the customer under subsection (a), or it is effective as the order of the customer under subsection (b).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Ok from the definitions alone, we see that we are the sender/originator of the first funds transfer/payment order. We issue the payment order when we instruct the bank to pay for the house for us.
 
Now, a couple of other things here.

From my earlier blog posts we found out that the bank Monetizes our private debt, it then turns around and sells it aka MBS(mortgage backed securities)

Now federal statue 15 usc 78c(10) tells us that any note maturing after 9 months is a security instrument.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78c
(10)
The term “security” means any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, security-based swap, bond, debenture, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement or in any oil, gas, or other mineral royalty or lease, any collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege on any security, certificate of deposit, or group or index of securities (including any interest therein or based on the value thereof), or any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege entered into on a national securities exchange relating to foreign currency, or in general, any instrument commonly known as a “security”; or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt for, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing; but shall not include currency or any note, draft, bill of exchange, or banker’s acceptance which has a maturity at the time of issuance of not exceeding nine months, exclusive of days of grace, or any renewal thereof the maturity of which is likewise limited.
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now the real test is if the instrument ACTS like a security, which by being monetized and securitization, we think that it is.  If it is a security instrument there can be no holder in due course as specified in UCC3-106d.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-106
(d) If a promise or order at the time it is issued or first comes into possession of a holder contains a statement, required by applicable statutory or administrative law, to the effect that the rights of a holder or transferee are subject to claims or defenses that the issuer could assert against the original payee, the promise or order is not thereby made conditional for the purposes of Section 3-104(a); but if the promise or order is an instrument, there cannot be a holder in due course of the instrument.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The way to defeat them in this game is to show, using the accounting forms banks are required to file, that we are the creditor and that no "loan" happened. Be it a home, car, or personal loan. The way to do this before a foreclosure action is to write out a QWR (http://consumerfinancialserviceslaw.us/recent-changes-to-the-law-governing-qualified-written-requests/).


For those already in foreclosure, the way to go about it is to file a counterclaim for recoupment or "setoff" as the one side of the books cancels the other side of the books. We can alo ask for the accounting documents thru discovery.


I have won cases using the information, I also do one on one training and I can provide legal information for those in need.

Hope this information helps you out there.

Monday, August 29, 2016

Understanding WHAT you are....... citizen.

Many of us have come to accept that we are citizens, citizens of the united states. But how many of us know what that means? How many of us have researched the word citizen? What are the duties/obligations of citizenship? What "rights" do we have and of what nature are these "rights"? Do citizens have the unalienable rights that Jefferson spoke of? Is it the bill of unalienable rights?

I have many posts already on this blog dealing with just these issues. The facts we should take away from this information is that citizens in any capacity are subjects. Subjects are slaves, forever to obey whatever their rulers tell them is "law". Now as usual, I don't expect folks to believe me, the government has spent A LOT of time and money to make you believe that you are free and the government is your servant.

This belief is not true, it never has been and never will be. The very nature of a fictional society can only work if the government has people it can GOVERN, it is impossible to govern people who do not have to obey your laws. This is basic common sense here folks, no Phd needed to understand how societies work.

I have compiled some quotes for you to show you that our leaders/founders not only understood this, but this was the plan all along.


"In any

and every point of view in which I am able to consider the

subject, Allegiance, in this country, is due to the government of

the people. I have, heretofore, and I shall use throughout this

opinion, the term Allegiance, because it is the one most commonly

used to denote the duty of the citizen to the government."
 
 
And just what is this duty to the government?
 
 
"but I will passingly remark
that the government may, under the authority of the Constitution, demand of the citizen the surrender of the last dollar
•which he possesses, and to peril his life in its defence, if the
public good requires"
 
 
 
BOTH quotes above are from the book of allegiance, (south Carolina court reporter) 1834
 
 
1st quote page 214, 2nd quote page 233, both from the judge's opinion's.
 
And just why does a citizen owe his last dollar or his life in defense of the country?
 
 
Take this quote from James Kent on American law in 1826....
 
“And if, at common law, all human beings born within the ligeance of the King, and under the King’s obedience, were natural-born subjects, and not aliens, I do not perceive why this doctrine does not apply to these United States, in all cases in which there is no express constitutional or statute declaration to the contrary. . . . Subject and citizen are, in a degree, convertible terms as applied to natives, and though the term citizen seems to be appropriate to republican freemen, yet we are, equally with the inhabitants of all other countries, subjects, for we are equally bound by allegiance and subjection to the government and law of the land.”

James Kent, COMMENTARIES ON AMERICAN LAW, pg. 258 (1826)
 
 
 
I also hate to break it to all the state nationals/state citizens, ALL governments require subjection, they were no more free as state citizens then as federal US citizens.
 
Lets follow their reasoning for a minute......
 

 State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: "the term 'citizen' in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject' in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government."
 
 
 
"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..."
Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
 
 
"The persons declared to be citizens are, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States,
but completely subject..."
Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94, 101, 102 (1884)
 
 
So what this says to me, is that a US citizen is a subject of the federal government.
 
so the classes in America are now this...
 
last: Citizens/subjects; Have to obey federal government, pay for the whole deal, low class of benefits that most are shamed if they take.
middle class: Federal employees; Paid to obey, tons more benefits then the lower class, mostly paid for by lower class.
upper class: Government and benefactors of government regulations/laws; Pay for nothing, insider information on all aspects of life, above the laws the lower two classes are subject too. 
 
 
I was going to include citizens rights in this post, but I will save it for part 2, this alone will be a little much for most of your beliefs to handle.
 
I do however want to leave you with a link to one of my other posts, to help enlighten you about the role you play in relation to the government...
 
 
Enjoy citizen!
 
 
 
 

Saturday, August 27, 2016

The scam called a bank loan part deux

In part deux of the bank loan scam we investigate if banks loan out deposits.

Lets take a look at federal reserve bank publication Modern Money Mechanics...

Of
course, they do not really pay out loans from the money
they receive as deposits
. If they did this, no additional
money would be created.

Also in the same publication under "expansion stage 1"


Loans are made by
crediting the borrower's deposit account, i.e.,
by creating additional deposit money.

https://archive.org/stream/ModernMoneyMechanics/MMM_djvu.txt


I highlighted CREDITING because it again reinforces the point, this was a currency swap, they are crediting you, not "loaning" you. And again they are creating this money they are giving to you, which is really just bank credit.


Lets take a look at another federal reserve bank publication, "i bet you thought" was put out by the NY fed to help dispel myths about money....

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED175743.pdf

Banks create money by "monetizing" the private debts of businesses, individuals and governments. That is, they create amounts of money against the value of those lOUs.



And there you have the key, they MONETIZE the private debt(promissory note).



What does 'Monetize' mean

To monetize is to convert an asset or any object into money or legal tender.


Read more: Monetize Definition | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monetize.asp#ixzz4HMzDpFha
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook


So how do they monetize your debt?

Well a promissory note is a negotiable instrument per UCC (check your state statutes)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104

We are the "Issuer/Maker of the instrument

3-105. ISSUE OF INSTRUMENT.
(a) "Issue" means the first delivery of an instrument by the maker or drawer, whether to a holder or nonholder, for the purpose of giving rights on the instrument to any person.
 
 
 
Lets go check some definitions....
 
 
Drawer" means a person who signs or is identified in a draft as a person ordering payment.
 
"Maker" means a person who signs or is identified in a note as a person undertaking to pay.
 
 
To go on, we need to understand the definitions of "payment order" and "funds transfer".
 
 
So now we understand that we are the originator of the first funds transfer.

More on the funds transfer aspect in part 3.

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

The scam called a bank loan.

I talk with many folks about the bank loan process, and most know little to nothing about it. Hopefully this post can help clear a little bit of it up for folks.

The loan process has many moving parts and for most it is hard to keep up, this post will be a lot easier for you to understand.

In order for you to pledge your promise to pay back a loan, the creditor must have suffered a legal detriment.

In contract law, consideration is a detriment to the promisee and a benefit to the promisor. In order to make for a valid contract and for legal detriment to have been suffered, consideration must be exchanged.

To incur detriment means to cement a promise by either refraining from doing something that one has a legal right to do or by doing something that one is not under any legal obligation to do.


Now at this point most of americans would assume the legal detriment is the bank loaning you money, if in fact they did loan you money, but in fact they did not.

In fact the "money" lent to you was in fact legally required and NOT something they were not under obligation to provide.

And just why is that you ask?

Because as the federal reserve bank publication (modern money mechanics) points out......
https://archive.org/stream/ModernMoneyMechanics/MMM_djvu.txt

What they do when they make
loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits
to the borrowers' transaction accounts.



Important to notice here are the words EXCHANGE and CREDITS.

Both the promissory note and the credits are called MONEY OF ACCOUNT


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/money%20of%20account

Definition of money of account
  1. :  a denominator of value or basis of exchange which is used in keeping accounts and for which there may or may not be an equivalent coin or denomination of paper money



The promissory note when deposited acts as cash as per federal law definition of the word DEPOSIT...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/1813


(l) Deposit

The term “deposit” means—
 
(1)
the unpaid balance of money or its equivalent received or held by a bank or savings association in the usual course of business and for which it has given or is obligated to give credit, either conditionally or unconditionally, to a commercial, checking, savings, time, or thrift account, or which is evidenced by its certificate of deposit, thrift certificate, investment certificate, certificate of indebtedness, or other similar name, or a check or draft drawn against a deposit account and certified by the bank or savings association, or a letter of credit or a traveler’s check on which the bank or savings association is primarily liable:
 
Provided
, That, without limiting the generality of the term “money or its equivalent”, any such account or instrument must be regarded as evidencing the receipt of the equivalent of money when credited or issued in exchange for checks or drafts or for a promissory note upon which the person obtaining any such credit or instrument is primarily or secondarily liable, or for a charge against a deposit account, or in settlement of checks, drafts, or other instruments forwarded to such bank or savings association for collection.
 
 
We also know this is true for a number of other reasons...
 
1. A holder in due course MUST accept the instrument for VALUE
 
 
2. In order to enforce a lost note the bank must indemnify.
 
The court may not enter judgment in favor of the person seeking enforcement unless it finds that the person required to pay the instrument is adequately protected against loss that might occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the instrument. Adequate protection may be provided by any reasonable means.
 
 
 
I will finish writing this up if there are those interested in learning more about it.

Monday, July 25, 2016

Intent

A big part of the play that we call our life today is affected by INTENT, as in our state of mind and our intentions. When trying to assert freedom, intent plays a huge part of the whole picture. Changing your status will mean nothing if your intentions are not in line with what you are saying.

Thankfully showing intent while researching our position is an easy enough process. I do it by using bumper stickers on my car detailing my intent, I also print shirts that tell folks of my intent and mindset. I run a blog and youtube channel speaking of the same subject matter and my intent as well.

When it is time for status change, it is clear not only by my declaration, but my intent has been well known for years now as to me not belonging to their political society.

If you think you can accept government benefits and such one day, and then change status and you are good, then friend you are mistaken. When confronted about your status, you best make damn sure, you have years of evidence backing your intent to be free. If you have to use a government program or benefit, say FRN'S, then make a public declaration about how you are using it because you must.


About intent, let us take a look at 8 USC 1481(b)


(b)
Whenever the loss of United States nationality is put in issue in any action or proceeding commenced on or after September 26, 1961 under, or by virtue of, the provisions of this chapter or any other Act, the burden shall be upon the person or party claiming that such loss occurred, to establish such claim by a preponderance of the evidence.
 
 
 
Now let us look at the legal definition of the word intent.
 

Intent

A determination to perform a particular act or to act in a particular manner for a specific reason; an aim or design; a resolution to use a certain means to reach an end.
Intent is a mental attitude with which an individual acts, and therefore it cannot ordinarily be directly proved but must be inferred from surrounding facts and circumstances. Intent refers only to the state of mind with which the act is done or omitted. It differs from motive, which is what prompts a person to act or to fail to act.





Let start showing our intent folks.